 |
The RCPLA network
is an alliance of seventeen different organisations
from around the world, that strives to promote the empowerment of
the disadvantaged through participation in their own development.
The Network helps researchers and practitioners share information
and experience about Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) approaches,
and encourages the improved implementation of these approaches globally.
The Network hopes to further the role of participatory approaches
into governance structures to create change. Each member of the
Network brings with it specific strengths, but are united in their
desire to provide access to a variety of resources.
History
The RCPLA Network
was established in 1997. The original goal of this collection of
resource centres was to bring together, organise, synthesise and
distribute information on participatory approaches prefarably in
more appropriate formats and local languages. This would contribute
to the exchange of knowledge and ideas between members, and help
promote effective participatory approaches at local, regional and
international levels.
Since
its creation, the RCPLA has helped to facilitate the development
of PLA ideas, organise workshops and seminars on PLA, to provide
training support, and to aid with research. Sharing resources across
continents has helped encourage the adoption of particpatory methods
around the world. Through the Network, partners have also influenced
the development and application of participatory methodologies on
local, national, and international levels.
Goal
& Principles for Action
We recognise
that we are only one group of actors, still in the early stage of
learning. These goals represent an attempt to contribute to better
practice for ourselves and others. We invite others to share their
experiences and to add to our goals to make a difference.
Help
maintain the integrity of PLA principles: The Network realizes
that the use of participatory approaches has become increasingly
popular with a variety of types of organisations, presenting opportunities
and challenges. “Participation” has been sanctioned
and promoted by government and aid agencies around the world, thus
bringing about increased access and control over resources, decision-making
processes, and traditional institutional barriers to local people.
However, a question still remains surrounding co-optation and who
controls the ultimate agenda surrounding the projects. The fear
is that “participation” is mentioned in proposals, followed
through in name only, without adherence to the true principles of
the methodologies, diluting the quality and potential of PLA. The
Network aims to make access to quality information about attitudes,
behaviour, and techniques to practitioners and decision-makers a
priority.
Encourage
the allocation of resources to make information management a priority
in project planning: Information management is crucial
to the practice of development. It avoids the repetition of errors,
ensures the quality of practice, and avoids the duplication of efforts.
Therefore we strive to work towards an increased allocation of resources
for time, personnel and finances to record the experiences of communities
and practitioners.
Focus
on the generation and distribution of appropriate research and development
approaches regarding policy change and institutional capacity building:
In addition to methodological, institutional and policy issues,
the Network considers issues surrounding the quality of materials
regarding professional and personal attitudes, behaviours, and ethics
towards local people. Stressing the value of the information produced
by agencies and local communities, as well as the importance of
access to it is key to addressing an imbalance in traditional, top-down
literature.
Encourage
the creation and production of grassroots documentation:
Currently, most documentation does not come from grassroots sources,
and when it does, it does not fully acknowledge its sources and
tends to be inaccessible. It is often suggested that the “grassroots”
lack the ability, time or interest to write. However, our experience
suggests that traditional systems have excluded the contributions
of the grassroots and make it challenging to create appropriate
resources. In addition, there has been a failure to create incentives
to allow this information to blossom. We must find the time, incentives,
and offer examples that facilitate the exchange of experience at
the grassroots.
Encourage
the creation of language and non-text accessible documentation and
communication to record the experience of local people:
Documentation has been primarily provided in dominant languages
and in formal, linear, text, and expensive forms. Rich oral traditions
cannot be accommodated by this traditional format and are subsequently
easily ignored. Raw experiences have not been recorded in the language
of the participants, in picture or audio-visual forms to accommodate
varying levels of literacy, and instead translated materials are
provided from the dominant agencies. There has also been minimal
investment in translation into languages other than English, and
from one field of work to another.
Create
a culture of sharing information: Instead of fostering
a competitive environment within the field of development, the Network
strives to establish an example of knowledge and best practices
sharing.
Encourage
a non-exploitative ethic on research and documentation:
Communities have often not benefited from the research that have
exploited their experiences and have instead benefited the researchers
or practitioners. Documentation must properly acknowledge the substantial
costs incurred by grassroots communities in their creation and space
must be created for grassroot communities to produce and direct
their own work.
|
|
|
|